(..2..)
QUESTION BANK
1. What is copyright? Explain the relevant provisions relating to copyright in literary, dramatic, musical works?
2. Explain copyright in dramatic and musical work.
3. Write in brief procedure for obtaining copyright.
4. Write detailed note on assignment and ownership of copyright.
5. What is infringement of copyright? Enumerate remedies for such infringement?
6. Explain the meaning concept and historical development of copyright.
7. Explain the concept of Copyright. Discuss various aspects of copyright justice.
Short Notes
1. Assignment of Copyright.
2. Video piracy.
3. Copyright Board.
4. Cinematographic films.
II. Nature of Copyright
III. Meaning of Copyright
IV. Definition of Copyright
1. Statutory Definition under Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957
3. Definition in the Oxford Dictionary
V. Characteristics of Copyright
2. A Bundle of Multiple Rights
3. A Statutory Monopoly Right
4. A Distinct Negative Right
5. Mandatory Requirement of Originality
VI. Historical Development of Copyright
1. The Copyright Act, 1957
VII. Subject Matter of Copyright
1. Literary Works
2. Artistic Works
3. Dramatic Works
4. Musical Works
5. Cinematograph Films
6. Sound Recordings
VIII. Author, Ownership, and Duration of Copyright
2. Determining Ownership through Authorship
3. Authorship in the Course of Employment
4. Joint Authorship
5. Statutory Exceptions to First Ownership under Section 17
a. Journalistic Works [Sec. 17(a)]:
b. Commissioned Works [Sec. 17(b)]:
c. General Employment [Sec. 17(c)]: .
d. Public Lectures [Sec. 17(cc)]:
e. Government Works [Sec. 17(d)]:
f. Public Undertakings [Sec. 17(dd)]:
g. International Organizations [Sec. 17(e)]:
6. Rights Conferred upon Copyright Owners
a. Statutory and Multiple Rights:
b. Negative Rights:
c. Economic Rights:
d. Moral Rights (Special Rights under Section 57):
7. Term and Duration of Copyright (Sections 22 to 29)
a. Literary, Dramatic, Musical, and Artistic Works:
b. Cinematograph Films and Sound Recordings:
c. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Works:
d. Government Works and International Organizations:
e. Broadcast Reproduction Rights (Section 37):
f. Performer’s Rights (Section 38):
IX. Registration of Copyright
1. Application for Registration
2. Service of Notice
3. Mandatory Waiting Period and Objections
5. Issuance of Certificate
X. Assignment and Licensing of Copyright
A. Assignment of Copyright
2. Statutory Conditions for Valid Assignment (Section 19)
3. Disputes, Transmission, and Relinquishment
a. Dispute Resolution (Section 19A):
b. Transmission by Operation of Law (Section 20):
c. Relinquishment of Rights (Section 21):
B. Licensing of Copyright
a. Voluntary Licenses (Section 30)
b. Compulsory and Statutory Licenses
i. Compulsory License for Indian Works (Section 31):
ii. Compulsory License for Dead or Untraceable Authors (Section 31A):
iii. Licenses for Persons with Disabilities (Section 31B):
iv. Statutory License for Cover Versions (Section 31C):
v. Statutory License for Broadcasting (Section 31D):
vi. License for Translations (Section 32):
vii. License for Works Not Available in India (Section 32A):
2. Termination of Licenses (Section 32B)
XI. Infringement of Copyright and Remedies
2. Statutory Framework and Judicial Tests
3. Statutory Exceptions to Infringement:
4. Legal Remedies Against Infringement
a. Civil Remedies (Sections 55 to 62)
i. Injunctions
ii. Search and Seizure Orders (The Anton Piller Order)
iii. Damages and Account of Profits
iv. Conversion Remedies (Section 58)
v. Protection Against Groundless Threats (Section 60)
b. Criminal Remedies
c. Administrative Remedies (Section 53)
XII. Copyright Office, Statutory Authorities, and Societies
2. The Copyright Board and Modern Tribunals (Sections 11 and 12)
a. Composition
b. Core Functions:
c. Powers under Section 74:
3. Copyright Societies (Sections 33 to 39A)
-----------
Short Notes
a. Unauthorized Tape/Digital Duplication: .
b. Breach of Commercial Terms:
c. Simultaneous Cable Exhibition:
4. Statutory Protections under Section 52A
Copyright stands as one of the oldest, foundational pillars of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs). Derived etymologically from the historical expression "copier of words," copyright marks the exclusive legal right granted to creative individuals—such as authors, playwrights, composers, and artists—to reproduce, publish, and control their original creations. In essence, it imposes a strict legal obligation upon the rest of society restraining them from copying or misappropriating the fruit of an individual’s intellectual labor without due authorization.
In ancient times, creative minds produced literature, music, and art primarily for societal enrichment, fame, and spiritual recognition rather than commercial exclusivity. Consequently, primitive legal systems lacked any formal framework for copyright protection. The critical need for a structured copyright regime emerged only after Johannes Gutenberg’s invention of the printing press in the 15th century. This technological leap enabled the mass reproduction of literary works, making unauthorized duplication highly lucrative and threatening the livelihoods of original creators.
In the Indian sub-continent, codified copyright law arrived during the colonial era with the enactment of the Indian Copyright Act of 1914, which was modeled directly on the United Kingdom's Copyright Act of 1911.
The fundamental objective of copyright law is to stimulate intellectual creativity by encouraging authors, composers, and artists to produce original works. The law achieves this by rewarding creators with exclusive statutory monopolies over their works for a legally specified, limited duration. This structure strikes a fine balance: it secures economic fruits for the creator while ensuring that the work eventually enters the public domain for the broader enrichment of society.
Historically, intellectual property received its first formal legislative recognition through copyright. Today, copyright is globally acknowledged as one of the core branches constituting the broader spectrum of intellectual property. It is essentially a form of intellectual creativity recognized, nurtured, and strictly protected by positive law.
For all practical and enforcement purposes, copyright is inherently territorial in nature. There is no singular, omnipotent international copyright statute; rather, enforcement is governed by domestic laws. While international conventions provide a harmonized framework, every sovereign nation establishes its own substantive and procedural rules concerning the protection, licensing, and enforcement of copyright within its geopolitical boundaries.
In its most essential terms, copyright means the exclusive right to copy, multiply, or reproduce an original work in which copyright subsists under the law. It represents a unique, intangible kind of intellectual property that arises automatically upon the creation of a work.
An author or composer acquires this right as a direct consequence of their intellectual labor, skill, and judgment. Therefore, copyright is not a right over raw, unformed thought; it is the legal shield acquired the moment an intellectual person translates their inner creativity into a tangible, perceivable form.
To understand its exact legal scope, copyright must be examined through statutory, judicial, and lexicographical definitions:
Under Indian law, Section 14 defines copyright as an exclusive right, subject to the provisions of the Act, to do or authorize the doing of certain specified acts in respect of a work or any substantial part thereof. These acts apply specifically to the following categories of works:
a. Literary, dramatic, or musical works (excluding computer programs under certain rental exceptions).
b. Artistic works.
c. Cinematograph films.
d. Sound recordings.
These statutory rights encompass the exclusive authority to reproduce the work in any material form (including electronic storage), issue copies to the public, perform or communicate the work to the public, produce translations or adaptations, and control commercial rentals.
Black’s Law Dictionary defines copyright as the right in literary property as recognized and sanctioned by positive law. It is an intangible, incorporeal right granted to the author or originator of certain literary or artistic productions, whereby they are invested, for a specified period, with the sole and exclusive privilege of multiplying copies of the work, as well as publishing and selling them.
The Oxford Dictionary defines copyright as an exclusive right, given by law, for a certain term of years, to an author, composer, etc. (or their assignee), to print, publish, and sell copies of an original work.
Synthesis: Synthesizing these definitions reveals that copyright is a statutory privilege derived from intellectual labor in literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic domains. It empowers the creator to prevent unauthorized third parties from copying, printing, or commercially exploiting their original expressions.
Copyright is not a common law right or an inherent natural right; it is strictly a creation of statute. It is granted, governed, and protected solely by the provisions of positive law enacted by the legislature, such as the Copyright Act of 1957 in India. Section 16 of the Act explicitly clarifies that no person is entitled to copyright or any similar right in any work except in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
Copyright is not a single, monolithic right. Instead, it comprises a complex bundle of multiple distinct rights. For example, in the case of a "literary work," this bundle includes the separate rights to reproduce the work, issue copies, perform it publicly, translate it into other languages, adapt it into a screenplay, or store it digitally. Each of these rights can be exploited or transferred independently.
Copyright acts as a statutory monopoly. For a legally prescribed period, it restricts all other persons from exercising any of the exclusive rights explicitly reserved for the lawful owner, thereby preventing unauthorized market competition.
The enforcement architecture of copyright is fundamentally negative in character. Rather than merely stating what the owner can do, it primarily operates by prohibiting others from doing specific acts without the owner’s consent. It empowers the creator to stop third parties from copying, selling, exhibiting, or exploiting their work without a valid license.
A foundational prerequisite for copyright protection is that the work must be original and not copied from a pre-existing source. The concept of "originality" does not mean the work must manifest completely groundbreaking or inventive thought. It simply requires that the expression must originate from the author through their own labor, skill, and judgment, rather than being a mere duplication of prior art.
Copyright protects the objective expression of an idea, never the idea itself. A raw thought, theme, plot, or historical fact floating in a person's mind receives zero copyright protection until it is reduced to a concrete, material form, such as a written manuscript, a recorded melody, or a photograph.
This fundamental dichotomy is firmly supported by leading judicial precedents:
a. In the English case of (1938) 107 LJ Ch 204
The Court ruled that the person who merely communicates an oral idea or anecdote cannot claim copyright; instead, the individual who invests the labor to reduce that idea into a written, structured expression is legally entitled to the copyright.
b. R.G. Anand v. M/s. Delux Films & Ors., (1978) 4 SCC 118
The Supreme Court of India conclusively held that there can be no copyright in a mere idea, subject matter, theme, plot, or historical fact. Copyright violation is strictly confined to the specific form, manner, arrangement, and expression of the idea adopted by the author.
The historical evolution of copyright law began globally with Johannes Gutenberg’s invention of the movable-type printing press in Germany around 1436. By enabling the mass production of books, this invention created an urgent need to protect the economic interests of authors and publishers from literary piracy.
While temporary printing privileges were initially granted by monarchs in Germany and England, the world's first exhaustive copyright statute was the Statute of Anne (1709) enacted in the United Kingdom. This historic Act shifted control away from printing guilds and vested the right directly in authors for a fixed term. Later, the UK Copyright Act of 1911 consolidated the regime by replacing earlier piecemeal laws and common law principles, extending its reach across the British Empire, including colonial India.
In the United States, the first federal Copyright Act was passed in 1790. In India, the East India Company introduced codified copyright through the Copyright Act of 1847, passed by the Governor-General. This was subsequently superseded by the British Copyright Act of 1911 via the Indian Copyright Act of 1914.
The colonial framework of 1914 remained in force until the sovereign Parliament of independent India enacted the comprehensive Copyright Act, 1957. To keep pace with rapid technological advancements and international treaty obligations, the independent Parliament has amended the Act periodically, most notably in 1982, 1994, 1999, and through the landmark amendments of 2012. Today, the Copyright Act, 1957 stands as an exhaustive, modern code governing the digital and physical creative landscape of India.
By virtue of Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957, copyright subsists exclusively in specific categories of works explicitly enumerated within the statute. No copyright can be claimed on any matter falling outside these statutory boundaries:
As established in the classic English precedent University of London Press Ltd. v. University Tutorial Press Ltd., [1916] 2 Ch. 601
The phrase "literary work" is not used in a purely aesthetic or qualitative sense. It covers any work expressed in printing or writing, irrespective of its literary style or artistic merit.
Under Section 2(o) of the Indian Act, the definition is inclusive and explicitly covers computer programs, tables, compilations, and computer databases. Consequently, literary work extends to university question papers, dictionaries, mathematical tables, encyclopedias, law report headnotes, digests, private letters, commercial catalogs, and lectures. For a literary work to secure protection, it must be original, meaning it must involve a modicum of independent skill, labor, and capital, rather than being copied.
Under Section 2(c) of the Act, an artistic work is defined as:
a. A painting, sculpture, drawing (including diagrams, maps, charts, or engineering plans), an engraving, or a photograph, regardless of whether or not the work possesses any intrinsic artistic quality.
b. A work of architecture.
c. Any other work of artistic craftsmanship.
Key sub-categories include:
i. Paintings: Must be original representations of colors on a surface, free from plagiarism.
ii. Sculptures: Includes abstract designs or object representations created through carving, chiseling, modeling, or casting.
iii. Drawings: Covers mechanical, engineering, or structural drawings, maps, and plans; no high aesthetic quality is legally required.
iv. Engravings: Defined under Section 2(i) to include etchings, lithographs, woodcuts, and prints.
v. Photographs: Governed by Section 2(s), this includes photolithography and processes analogous to photography, excluding cinematograph film frames. In The Associated Publishers (Madras) Ltd. v. K. Bashyam alias Arya, [AIR 1961 Mad 114], The Madras High Court held that a portrait of Mahatma Gandhi created by creatively combining elements of two separate distinct photographs constituted an original, copyrightable artistic work.
vi. Works of Architecture: Covers buildings, structures, or their design models. Crucially, architectural copyright attaches strictly to the artistic design and character; it never extends to the physical processes or methods of construction.
vii. Works of Artistic Craftsmanship: Protects hand-made or machine-manufactured consumer items that reflect sufficient individual craftsmanship and design flair, such as designer jewelry, custom furniture, and unique toys.
Section 2(h) defines a dramatic work to include any piece of recitation, choreographic work, or entertainment in a dumb show, where the scenic arrangement or acting form is fixed in writing or otherwise. It explicitly excludes cinematograph films, which are protected under their own category.
A dramatic work represents the structured application of a playwright’s labor and ability. Choreographic works, which involve the art of composing dance movements and stage patterns using notation systems, are protected here, ensuring that stage productions cannot be stolen or re-enacted without permission.
Section 2(p) defines a musical work as a work consisting of music, including any graphical notation of such work. Crucially, it excludes any words or actions intended to be sung, spoken, or performed alongside the music.
Under Indian law, there is no single copyright in a composite "song." A song is legally split: the lyrics create a literary copyright for the lyricist, while the underlying melody creates a musical copyright for the composer. Remix songs are treated as adaptations of musical works; if executed under statutory guidelines, they do not necessarily infringe upon the original musical composition.
Gramophone Co. of India Ltd. v. Super Cassette Industries Ltd., 1996 (36) DRJ 538
The Court clarified that a version recording (cover version) can claim independent copyright protection only if it is created through a skillful, laborious rearrangement of music, and is executed after complying with the strict statutory requirements and permissions of the original copyright owner.
Under Section 2(f), a cinematograph film means any work of visual recording, including a sound recording accompanying such visual recording, alongside any process analogous to cinematography, such as video films. In Balwinder Singh v. Delhi Administration, [AIR 1984 Del 379]
The Court confirmed that video films and television broadcasts fall squarely within the meaning of cinematograph films under Section 13(1)(b).
Section 2(xx) defines a sound recording as a recording of sounds from which such sounds may be produced, regardless of the medium (discs, tapes, or digital formats) or the method used to generate them. The producer is legally recognized as the author of a sound recording. The underlying musical work and the final sound recording embodying that music remain separate, distinct subjects of copyright.
A claim to copyright ownership is rooted in the act of original expression, not in the conceptualization of an idea. The individual who gives concrete, tangible shape to a thought is the true creator. The person who merely suggests a theme or plot to an artist cannot claim ownership. Thus, when an author creates a work independently, they are automatically recognized as the initial owner of the copyright.
First ownership is closely tied to statutory authorship. Under Section 2(d) of the Act, the "Author" is defined as:
a. For literary or dramatic works: The author of the work.
b. For musical works: The composer.
c. For artistic works (excluding photographs): The artist.
d. For photographs: The person taking the photograph.
e. For cinematograph films or sound recordings: The producer.
f. For computer-generated literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic works: The person who causes the work to be created.
The general rule dictates that if a person is employed under a contract of service or apprenticeship and is paid to create a work, the copyright in that product belongs to the employer, subject to any agreement to the contrary. However, if an employee creates a work independently, outside their hours of employment and beyond the scope of their contract, the copyright remains with the employee.
In V.T. Thomas v. Malayalam Manorama (1988) (2) KLT 466,
The Kerala High Court held that the copyright in popular cartoon characters created by the cartoonist V.T. Thomas long before his employment under the newspaper group belonged to the cartoonist himself, as they were not created in the course of employment under that specific contract of service.
Section 2(z) defines a work of joint authorship as a work produced by the collaboration of two or more authors, where the contribution of one author is not distinct from the contribution of the other author(s). In such scenarios, both creators are joint authors and share equal co-ownership of the copyright.
While Section 17 establishes that the author is the first owner of copyright, it carves out specific exceptions:
a. Journalistic Works [Sec. 17(a)]: If a literary, dramatic, or artistic work is created by an author in the course of employment under a contract of service with a newspaper, magazine, or periodical, the proprietor owns the copyright for publication purposes, unless agreed otherwise.
b. Commissioned Works [Sec. 17(b)]: Where a photograph is taken, a painting drawn, or a cinematograph film made at the instance of a person for valuable consideration, that commissioning person is the first owner.
c. General Employment [Sec. 17(c)]: For works created during general employment under a contract of service or apprenticeship, the employer is the first owner.
d. Public Lectures [Sec. 17(cc)]: The person delivering a public speech or address owns the copyright. However, if the speech is delivered on behalf of another person or entity, that entity owns the copyright.
e. Government Works [Sec. 17(d)]: The Government is the first owner of works created or published under its direction or control.
f. Public Undertakings [Sec. 17(dd)]: The public undertaking concerned owns the first copyright for works created under its direction.
g. International Organizations [Sec. 17(e)]: For works falling under Section 41, the concerned international organization is recognized as the first owner.
A copyright owner enjoys a robust matrix of rights divided into:
a. Statutory and Multiple Rights: The exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, translate, and adapt the work under Section 14.
b. Negative Rights: The power to exclude and prevent unauthorized exploitation by third parties.
c. Economic Rights: Rights that allow the owner to exploit the work commercially through licensing, assignment, or sales in exchange for royalties or lump-sum financial considerations.
d. Moral Rights (Special Rights under Section 57): These rights remain with the author even after the assignment of economic rights. They include:
i. The Right of Paternity: The right to claim authorship of the work.
ii. The Right of Integrity: The right to restrain or claim damages for any distortion, mutilation, modification, or derogatory act that harms the author's honor or reputation.
Copyright protection is bound by time to prevent permanent monopolies. The statutory durations are categorized as follows:
a. Literary, Dramatic, Musical, and Artistic Works: The lifetime of the author plus 60 years, calculated from the beginning of the calendar year following the author's death. For joint authors, the 60-year post-death period begins after the passing of the last surviving author.
b. Cinematograph Films and Sound Recordings: 60 years, calculated from the beginning of the calendar year following the year in which the film or recording was published.
c. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Works: 60 years from the year of publication.
d. Government Works and International Organizations: 60 years from the year of first publication.
e. Broadcast Reproduction Rights (Section 37): Subsists for 25 years from the year of broadcast.
f. Performer’s Rights (Section 38): Subsists for 50 years from the year in which the performance was made.
Under Indian law, the registration of copyright is purely optional, not mandatory. Copyright protection triggers automatically the moment an original work is fixed in a tangible medium. However, formal registration is highly advisable because an entry in the Register of Copyrights serves as prima facie evidence in a court of law during infringement disputes.
In M/s. Glaxo Operations U.K. Ltd. v. M/s. Samrat Pharmaceuticals, [AIR 1984 Del 265]
The Delhi High Court confirmed that copyright exists independently of registration. The court noted that registration does not create copyright; rather, it provides strong documentary evidence regarding the date from which the author publicly claimed the right.
Section 45 of the Act, read alongside Rule 16 of the Copyright Rules, outlines the procedural steps for registration:
The author, publisher, owner, or any person interested in the copyright must submit an application in triplicate to the Registrar of Copyrights using Form IV. This application must be accompanied by the prescribed statutory fee and copies of the work.
The applicant is legally required to serve notice of their application to every third party who maintains or claims an interest in the subject matter, or who disputes the applicant’s rights, ensuring transparency.
Upon receipt of the application, the Registrar mandates a 30-day waiting period. If any objections are raised within this timeframe, or if the Registrar doubts the accuracy of the application, the Registrar will conduct a formal inquiry. After hearing both sides, the Registrar will enter the particulars or reject the application as deemed proper.
If no objections are received within 30 days and the Registrar is fully satisfied with the truth of the statements, the particulars of the work (title, author name, address, owner details) are entered into the official Register of Copyrights maintained under Section 44.
Following the entry, the Registrar provides a certified copy of the registration details to the concerned parties, providing them with strong defensive proof against future biopiracy or intellectual theft.
A copyright owner can choose to exploit their work personally or transfer their rights to third parties through two primary legal mechanisms: Assignment or Licensing.
An Assignment represents a partial or total transfer of ownership over the copyright, transforming the recipient into the new owner of those assigned rights. A License does not transfer ownership; it merely grants permission to a third party to perform specific acts that would otherwise be legally prohibited. The person transferring the right is the assignor/licensor, and the recipient is the assignee/licensee. Sections 18, 19, and 19A govern assignments, while Sections 30 to 32B regulate licensing.
The owner of an existing work, or the prospective owner of a future work, can assign their copyright either wholly or partially, generally or subject to specific limitations, and either for the entire duration of the copyright or any part thereof. Crucially, an assignment of future work takes legal effect only when the work actually comes into existence.
Under Section 19, a valid assignment must meet strict criteria:
a. It must be executed in writing and signed directly by the assignor or their duly authorized agent.
b. The assignment deed must explicitly specify the identity of the work, the precise rights assigned, the exact duration, the territorial extent, the rate of royalty payable to the author or their legal heirs, and the terms governing revision or termination.
c. Statutory Presumptions: If the assignee fails to exercise their assigned rights within one year from the date of execution, the assignment lapses automatically unless otherwise specified. If the duration is omitted, it is presumed to be 5 years. If the territorial extent is left blank, it is presumed to extend only within the territory of India.
In K.A. Venugopala Setty v. Dr Suryakantha U. Kamath, [AIR 1992 Kant 1],
The Karnataka High Court ruled that since the statute explicitly mandates that an assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor, no other informal mode—such as an oral agreement—is legally permissible or recognizable.
a. Dispute Resolution (Section 19A): The Commercial Courts or the specialized Intellectual Property Division (IPD) of High Courts have the authority to adjudicate disputes concerning the terms of an assignment upon receiving a complaint from the aggrieved assignor.
b. Transmission by Operation of Law (Section 20): If a copyright owner dies without leaving a valid will, their copyright interest passes automatically to their legal representatives as part of their estate.
c. Relinquishment of Rights (Section 21): An author can completely renounce their copyright by giving formal notice to the Registrar of Copyrights, which causes the rights to enter the public domain.
Licenses are broadly categorized into:
The current or prospective owner of a copyright can voluntarily grant an interest in their right via a written license deed signed by them or their authorized agent. Like assignments, a voluntary license for a future work takes effect only when the work is created.
To prevent copyright owners from unreasonably restricting public access to knowledge, the law allows for the grant of compulsory licenses under specific conditions:
i. Compulsory License for Indian Works (Section 31): If a copyright owner unreasonably refuses to republish a work, perform it in public, or allow its communication via broadcast, thereby withholding the work from the public, an application can be filed to compel the grant of a license.
In M/s. Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. v. M/s. Super Cassette Industries Ltd., (2008) 13 SCC 30
The Supreme Court of India observed that copyright law must balance the private economic rights of the owner with the broader public interest of access to knowledge. Consequently, a copyright holder cannot withhold their work from the public purely based on personal whims or unreasonable commercial terms.
ii. Compulsory License for Dead or Untraceable Authors (Section 31A): If an unpublished or published work is withheld from the Indian public because the author is dead, unknown, or untraceable, an applicant can petition for a license after publishing a public proposal in a daily newspaper.
iii. Licenses for Persons with Disabilities (Section 31B): Any individual or organization working for the benefit of persons with disabilities can apply for a compulsory license to publish a copyrighted work in accessible formats.
iv. Statutory License for Cover Versions (Section 31C): Allows the creation of a cover version of a song provided a sound recording of the work has already been released with the original owner's consent. The person making the cover version must give prior notice, use the same medium, maintain the integrity of the work, and pay advance royalties at the rates fixed by the statutory authorities.
v. Statutory License for Broadcasting (Section 31D): Empowers broadcasting organizations to communicate published literary, musical, or sound recording works to the public via radio or television, subject to serving prior notice and paying advance royalties at rates fixed by the authorities.
vi. License for Translations (Section 32): Enables individuals to apply for a license to translate and publish a work for teaching, scholarship, or research purposes after a specified statutory period (typically 7 years for Indian works and 3 years for foreign works).
vii. License for Works Not Available in India (Section 32A): If copies of a literary, scientific, or artistic edition are unavailable in India or have not been sold to the public for 6 months at a reasonable price, an individual can apply for a non-exclusive license to reproduce and publish the work for systematic instructional activities.
If a compulsory translation or reproduction license has been granted under Section 32 or 32A, and the original copyright owner subsequently introduces a highly similar, reasonably priced translation or edition in the Indian market, the compulsory license will be terminated. The termination takes effect three months after a formal notice is served, though the licensee is permitted to sell off their remaining stock.
Infringement occurs when a third party exploits a copyrighted work without obtaining proper authorization, an assignment, or a license from the rightful owner. Any unauthorized reproduction, public performance, commercial distribution, or communication to the public for monetary gain constitutes an infringement, directly harming the economic interests of the creator.
Section 51 dictates that a copyright is infringed when any person, without a valid license, does anything that is the exclusive right of the owner, permits a place to be used for profit for infringing public communications, or commercially sells, distributes, imports, or exhibits infringing copies. Under Section 51(b), reproducing a literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic work in the form of a cinematograph film without permission is explicitly deemed an infringement.
In the landmark judgment R.G. Anand v. M/s. Delux Films & Ors., (1978) 4 SCC 118, The Supreme Court of India laid down definitive guidelines to determine copyright infringement:
a. There is no copyright in a bare idea or historical theme; infringement is strictly confined to the unique form, manner, and arrangement of expression.
b. Where a common idea is developed differently, similarities are bound to occur. Courts must evaluate whether these similarities affect substantial and fundamental aspects of the original mode of expression.
c. The Lay Observer Test: One of the surest tests of infringement is whether a reasonable reader, spectator, or viewer, after seeing both works, gets an unmistakable, clear impression that the subsequent work is a copy of the original.
d. Material and broad dissimilarities negate an intention to copy, indicating that any overlapping elements are merely incidental.
e. Copyright violation amounts to piracy and must be proven by clear, cogent evidence.
Historically, English courts applied the "Sweat of the Brow" doctrine, which granted copyright protection to any compilation or work based purely on the expenditure of time, labor, and capital, without requiring creative inventiveness.
However, modern jurisprudence has shifted away from this low standard. In the landmark case Eastern Book Company & Others v. D.B. Modak & Another, (2008) 1 SCC 1, the Supreme Court of India rejected the "Sweat of the Brow" approach and adopted the global "Modicum of Creativity" standard. This shift was reinforced by the Delhi High Court in Giant Rocket Media and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. v. Ms. Priyanka Ghatak And Ors., CS(COMM) 736/2019 The courts held that copyright cannot be granted merely because time, energy, and labor were expended. For a work to secure protection, it must exhibit a minimal degree of individual creativity, intellectual effort, and a character that differentiates it from the raw source material.
Section 52 enumerates specific acts that do not constitute an infringement of copyright. Grounded in the public interest, these exceptions include:
a. Fair Dealing: Using a literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic work for private use (including personal research), criticism, review, or reporting current events in newspapers, magazines, or broadcasts.
b. Educational Exceptions: The reproduction of works by a teacher or pupil in the course of instruction, inclusion in examination question papers, or performances within educational institutions.
c. Public Libraries: Making up to three copies of a book for the use of a public library if the book is out of print.
d. Judicial & Legislative Proceedings: The reproduction of any work for the purpose of a judicial proceeding, law reports, or official legislative business.
e. Public Spaces: Making or publishing drawings, paintings, or photographs of architectural works or sculptures permanently located in a public place.
f. Official Documents: The reproduction or publication of any Act of the Legislature, government reports, or court judgments.
The Copyright Act, 1957 provides a multi-pronged remedial framework to address violations:
Plaintiffs can file a civil suit before a District Court or High Court having jurisdiction (Section 62) to seek:
An injunction is a judicial order restraining the commission or continuance of a wrongful act. It can be prohibitory (restraining an act) or mandatory (compelling an act). To secure a temporary, interlocutory injunction to maintain the status quo before trial, the plaintiff must establish a prima facie case, prove that the balance of convenience lies in their favor, and demonstrate that a failure to grant relief would cause them irreparable injury.
(1). In John Richard Brady & Others v. Chemical Process Equipment P. Ltd. & Another, [AIR 1987 Del 372], The Delhi High Court granted an injunction after finding a prima facie case that the defendant was unauthorizedly manufacturing machines based on the plaintiff’s technical drawings.
(2). In Bajaj Electricals Ltd. v. Gaurav Bajaj, 2020 (82) PTC 342 (Bom), the Bombay High Court granted an interim injunction against the defendant for violating the plaintiff's copyright and trademark rights by using deceptively similar artistic labels.
Derived from the English precedent Anton Piller KG v. Manufacturing Processes Ltd., this ex-parte order permits the plaintiff, accompanied by a court commissioner, to enter the defendant's premises without prior warning to search for, seize, and preserve infringing copies or illicit production equipment, preventing the destruction of evidence.
A plaintiff can seek compensatory damages to recover the financial losses caused by the infringement. Alternatively, they can seek an Account of Profits, which compels the infringer to hand over the illicit net profits earned from the unauthorized exploitation of the work.
Under Section 58, all infringing copies and production plates are legally deemed the property of the copyright owner. The owner can initiate proceedings to recover possession of these items or claim damages for conversion, unless the defendant proves they were reasonably unaware that copyright subsisted in the work.
If a person issues groundless threats of legal proceedings for copyright infringement through circulars or advertisements, the aggrieved party can file a declaratory suit to secure an injunction against the continuation of such threats and recover damages. As affirmed in Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company & Ors. v. Natco Pharma Ltd. 2020 (82) PTC 399 (Del), This defense is unavailable if the person issuing the threats promptly initiates and prosecutes a formal infringement suit.
Copyright infringement is a cognizable and non-bailable criminal offense. The penal liabilities under the Act are structured as follows:
Section | Nature of Criminal Offense | Statutory Punishment |
Section 63 | Infringement of copyright or other statutory rights. | Imprisonment of 6 months to 3 years, and a fine of â‚ą50,000 to â‚ą2 Lakhs. |
Section 63A | Enhanced penalty for second and subsequent convictions. | Imprisonment of 1 year to 3 years, and a fine of â‚ą1 Lakh to â‚ą2 Lakhs. |
Section 63B | Knowingly using an infringing copy of a computer program. | Imprisonment of 7 days to 3 years, and a fine of â‚ą50,000 to â‚ą2 Lakhs. |
Section 65 | Possession of plates/materials for making infringing copies. | Imprisonment up to 3 years, and a fine. |
Section 65B | Unauthorized circumvention of Rights Management Information. | Imprisonment up to 2 years, and a fine. |
Section 67 | Making false entries in the Register of Copyrights. | Imprisonment up to 1 year, a fine, or both. |
Section 68 | Making false statements to deceive or influence an officer. | Imprisonment up to 1 year, a fine, or both. |
Section 68A | Publication of sound recordings/video films violating Sec 52A. | Imprisonment up to 3 years, and a fine. |
Section 69 | Offenses committed by corporate companies. | Every person in charge of and responsible to the company for the conduct of its business is deemed guilty alongside the company. |
An owner can apply to the Registrar of Copyrights to request an administrative ban on the importation of infringing copies into India. The customs authorities can then seize and confiscate the illicit goods at the border.
An official Copyright Office has been established under the administrative control of the Central Government, located in New Delhi. The office is headed by a Registrar of Copyrights, assisted by Deputy Registrars. The Registrar is responsible for maintaining the Register of Copyrights, processing applications, and serving as the ex-officio Secretary to the statutory board.
The Copyright Board was established as a quasi-judicial body vested with the powers of a Civil Court under Section 74. It is mandated to follow the principles of natural justice.
Important Legislative Update: Through subsequent central amendments and the Tribunal Reforms Act, the functions of the erstwhile Copyright Board were merged into the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), which was subsequently abolished. Today, these specialized adjudicatory functions are vested directly within the Intellectual Property Divisions (IPD) of the High Courts and the Commercial Courts.
The statutory composition and functions include:
a. Composition: Consisted of a Chairman (who is or has been a High Court Judge) and between 2 to 14 specialized members, appointed for a 5-year term.
b. Core Functions: Adjudicating disputes regarding publication dates, determining whether foreign terms are shorter, settling assignment disputes under Section 19A, rectifying the Register, and granting compulsory or statutory licenses under Sections 31, 31A, 32, and 32A.
c. Powers under Section 74: Includes the power to summon witnesses, examine individuals under oath, compel the production of documents, receive affidavit evidence, and issue commissions. Appeals against these decisions lie directly before the High Court within 3 months.
A Copyright Society is a registered collective administration organization formed voluntarily by copyright owners. Operating under the direct collective control of authors and creators, these societies (such as IPRS for music and IRRO for literature) are authorized to issue licenses, collect royalties on behalf of their members, and distribute the economic fruits equitably, simplifying the licensing process for commercial users.
--------------------
The rapid evolution of consumer technology has made intellectual piracy a major global challenge. The ease of copying digital files and high-speed data transmission allows unauthorized entities to reproduce, distribute, and screen movies and TV programs on a massive scale without compensating the original producers, authors, or artists. This systemic copyright theft costs film producers hundreds of crores in lost revenue annually. It also harms the state exchequer through widespread tax evasion, such as unpaid entertainment and goods services taxes.
Historically, this problem manifested through unauthorized video parlors and cable operators screening uncertified, illicit copies of films for an admission fee. To protect the domestic film industry from these losses, the Parliament intervened by inserting Section 52A into the Copyright Act via an amendment in 1984, introducing strict visual disclosure mandates to curb piracy.
Video piracy is the unauthorized reproduction, distribution, selling, or public exhibition of a cinematograph film or video recording without obtaining a valid commercial license or consent from the lawful copyright holder (the producer). Capturing, ripping, or distributing digital copies of movies without authorization constitutes a severe criminal breach of the producer's exclusive statutory rights.
a. Unauthorized Tape/Digital Duplication: Creating pirated physical cassettes, discs, or digital torrent files of a movie when the video rights have not been sold by the producer.
b. Breach of Commercial Terms: Purchasing standard home-viewing copies and unauthorizedly broadcasting them across local cable TV networks, public video parlors, or commercial buses.
c. Simultaneous Cable Exhibition: A common challenge where pirated copies of newly released movies are streamed on illicit online platforms or cable networks simultaneously with their theatrical release, destroying box-office revenues.
Section 52A imposes strict publishing requirements on video films and sound recordings. Under Section 52A(2), no person shall publish or exhibit a video film unless the following particulars are clearly displayed upon the film itself and printed on its physical container:
a. A copy of the formal certificate granted by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) under the Cinematograph Act, 1952.
b. The explicit name and address of the person who manufactured the video film, alongside a clear declaration that they have obtained a valid license from the copyright owner.
c. The official name and address of the actual copyright owner of the underlying work.
In the landmark case State of Andhra Pradesh v. Nagoti Venkataramana, (1996) 6 SCC 409
The Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutional objective of Section 52A. The Apex Court ruled that exhibiting or possessing a video film that fails to display the mandatory statutory particulars automatically constitutes an infringement of copyright, making the distributor liable for criminal prosecution regardless of whether the original owner testifies.
Producers can pursue the full range of civil, criminal, and administrative remedies against video pirates. Crucially, Section 68A prescribes strict criminal penalties for non-compliance with Section 52A, punishing the publication or exhibition of non-compliant video films with imprisonment for up to 3 years alongside a substantial criminal fine.
*****