Question Bank
Q. 1. Explain the jurisprudential concept of property.
Q. 2. Explain the concept of property. State the kinds of property.
Q. 3. Explain the concept of property. State the modes of acquisition of property.
SHORT NOTES.
1. Kinds of property.
SYNOPSIS
i. Goodwill:
ii. Copyright:
iii. Patent Rights:
iv. Trademarks:
v. Industrial Designs:
i. Lease:
ii. Servitudes / Easements:
iii. Securities:
iv. Trust:
The concept of property is central to human existence, as material and immaterial objects are essential for human survival, development, and economic progress. In jurisprudence, the term "property" does not merely refer to physical objects but signifies a bundle of rights—specifically, proprietary rights in rem (rights enforceable against the world at large).
Historically and theoretically, the term "property" is understood in three distinct senses:
Supported by theorists like Thomas Hobbes, William Blackstone, and John Locke, this view holds that a person's property includes all of their legal rights. It encompasses:
a. Corporeal rights: Ownership over tangible objects like land, buildings, and vehicles.
b. Incorporeal rights: Intellectual property like copyrights and patents.
c. Personal rights: The right to life, personal liberty, and reputation.
Jurisprudential Maxim: A man's property is everything that is "his" in the eyes of the law. This broad interpretation is highly favored in modern constitutional jurisprudence.
This view restricts the definition of property to a person's proprietary rights, deliberately excluding personal rights (such as liberty, reputation, or choice of profession). Under this interpretation, property consists only of rights that can be measured or evaluated in monetary terms, including both tangible assets (land, cars) and intangible commercial assets (shares, goodwill, patents).
Championed by Jeremy Bentham, this traditional view limits "property" exclusively to the right of ownership over physical, material objects (e.g., houses, land, gold). It completely excludes incorporeal or intangible rights like copyrights, trademarks, or goodwill.
Modern jurisprudence classifies property into two major categories: Corporeal and Incorporeal.
Corporeal property refers to the right of ownership over tangible, material objects that can be seen, felt, or physically touched. It is further subdivided into:
a. Immovable Property: Land, buildings, and things permanently attached to the earth.
b. Movable Property: Chattels, vehicles, gold, and goods that can be transported from one place to another.
Incorporeal property refers to the ownership of intangible objects or rights. Salmond divided incorporeal property into two categories:
These are intellectual assets produced by human labor, skill, and intellect. Today, they are governed comprehensively under Intellectual Property Rights (IPR):
i. Goodwill: The commercial value of a business's reputation, fame, and customer connections built up over years of honest work.
Case Reference: In Khushal Khemgar Shah v. Khorshed Banu (1970 SCR (3) 689), the Supreme Court of India confirmed that the goodwill of a firm is an intangible asset and a form of property that does not vanish upon the death of a partner.
ii. Copyright: The exclusive legal right granted to creators to reproduce, sell, or distribute original artistic, literary, dramatic, musical, or choreographic works. In India, this is protected under the Copyright Act, 1957.
iii. Patent Rights: Exclusive rights granted for new, non-obvious, and useful technological inventions, giving the inventor a temporary monopoly over its manufacture and sale. Governed by the Patents Act, 1970.
iv. Trademarks: Distinctive signs, logos, corporate designs, or catchphrases used by businesses to distinguish their products or services from competitors. Protected under the Trademarks Act, 1999.
v. Industrial Designs: Visual designs, configurations, shapes, or ornamentation applied to industrial items (furniture, toys, textiles). Protected under the Designs Act, 2000.
These are rights in rem exercised by a person over property owned by someone else. They legally "run with the land" and bind future owners:
i. Lease: A separation of possession and ownership, where the owner (lessor) transfers the limited right to enjoy and use an immovable asset to a lessee for a specific timeframe or in perpetuity.
ii. Servitudes / Easements: A right enjoyed by a landowner over neighboring land owned by another (e.g., right of way, right to light, or right to draw water). Governed by the Indian Easements Act, 1882.
iii. Securities: A legal encumbrance vested in a creditor over a debtor's property to secure repayment of a debt.
- Pledge / Lien: Security created over movable property.
- Mortgage: Security created over immovable property.
iv. Trust: An obligation annexed to ownership, where the legal title of the property is held by a trustee, but restricted to be managed solely for the benefit of a third party called the beneficiary. Governed by the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
Salmond highlights four primary jurisprudence pathways for acquiring lawful property:
Possion represents the physical control over an object and constitutes prima facie evidence of ownership.
a. A possessor is legally protected against everyone except the true owner. Even the true owner cannot forcefully evict a possessor without following due process of law.
b. Res Nullius: Property belonging to no one (e.g., wild animals, fish in the sea) becomes the absolute property of the first person who captures or possesses it.
- Case Reference: In the classic English case of Armory v. Delamirie (1722) 1 Str 505, it was established that the finder of a lost object acquires a right to keep it against all the world except the rightful owner.
Prescription is the legal effect of the lapse of time in creating or destroying property rights.
a. Positive (Acquisitive) Prescription: Long, continuous, and uninterrupted usage of a right creates a valid legal title. For example, under Indian law, continuously using a right of way through another’s land for over 20 years (or 30 years against government land) grants an absolute easement right.
b. Negative (Extinctive) Prescription: The loss of a right due to a failure to exercise it within the legally prescribed timeframe. For instance, under the Limitation Act, 1963, if a creditor fails to sue a debtor for recovery within 3 years, the right to file a suit to recover that debt is legally extinguished.
Agreement is the most frequent and dynamic mode of property acquisition today, occurring via mutual consent between parties. It is categorized into two forms:
a. Assignment: The formal transfer of an owner's existing rights to another person (e.g., a contract of sale).
b. Grant: The creation of new subordinate rights carved out of the owner's existing bundle of rights (e.g., creating a lease, mortgage, or pledge).
Inheritance is the legal devolution of property rights upon the death of the owner to their legal heirs or designated beneficiaries. It can occur in two ways:
a. Testamentary Succession: Devolution based on a validly executed Will left by the deceased.
b. Intestate Succession: Devolution by operation of law when a person dies without leaving a Will (governed by personal laws such as the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 or the Indian Succession Act, 1925).
To ensure this content is fully up to date, it is essential to trace how property is treated under modern Indian constitutional law:
1. Originally, the Right to Property was a Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31 of the Constitution of India.
2. Via the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978, the Parliament removed property from the list of Fundamental Rights.
3. Today, it exists as a constitutional and legal right under Article 300A, which explicitly dictates: "No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law."
Case Reference: In Vidya Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2020) 2 SCC 569,
The Supreme Court ruled that the right to property is a human right. The state cannot take possession of a citizen's private property without following due process of law and offering just compensation, otherwise it amounts to a violation of Article 300A.
*****